|
|
Post by kalashnikov on Oct 7, 2004 5:57:51 GMT -5
I removed posts older than 93 days on the forums.
|
|
BaM
Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by BaM on Oct 7, 2004 14:21:06 GMT -5
i think you can even remove a few more recent posts since they seem closed or havent been replied for two months
|
|
|
|
Post by thebull on Nov 3, 2004 22:32:57 GMT -5
I removed posts older than 93 days on the forums. Is that why some forums have a minus in front of the # of posts like Entertainment -37 -183 as opposed to general board?  I hope I didn't miss anything to important or entertaining to read!   Why would you do this other than to save space?  |
|
|
|
Post by Killer on Nov 4, 2004 6:31:31 GMT -5
I don't agree with removing the old posts. This place is very empty now. No one posts at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wardle Murray on Nov 7, 2004 20:08:46 GMT -5
I removed posts older than 93 days on the forums. Why, were they against the rules or something? And won't people lose post counts? |
|
|
|
Post by Wardle Murray on Nov 7, 2004 20:10:29 GMT -5
I don't agree with removing the old posts. This place is very empty now. No one posts at all. I second that. That's why I like EMD - Edwin doesn't automatically cull posts over a certain age. IMO forums that do this are suggesting that old posts are not as valid as new ones, and for discussion purposes how is this the case? Adam |
|
|
|
Post by robert@fm on Nov 16, 2004 14:34:24 GMT -5
I agree with Killer and Wardle Murray — I don't like boards where posts are removed for no apparent reason.
Please could we not have any further culling, unless for any reason it's necessary (and please tell us the reason)...
|
|
|
|
Post by Susan on Nov 25, 2006 9:17:07 GMT -5
I don't think that there have been any more posts removed since that time. There were some we had to delete before do to them being of a highly inappropriate nature. I think now we are on track and everything should remain as is.
;D Susan.
|
|
